|
Introduction:
The following text is taken from:
| Beck, |
David, (1997). Rheme, Theme, and communicative structure in Lushootseed and Bella Coola. In Leo Wanner (ed.), Recent Trends in Meaning-Text Theory, 93 - 135. Amsterdam: Benjamins |
The Meaning-Text Theory (MTT), first put forward in Moscow by Zholkovskij & Mel'chuk (1965), operates on the principle that language consists in a mapping from the content or meaning (semantics) of an utterance to its form or text (phonetics). Intermediate between these poles are additional levels of representation, as illustrated in (1):
(1) Representations at the Semantic, Syntactic, and Morphological levels
 |
(adapted from Mel'chuk 1988: 49)
|
Sequential mapping of representations of the various levels passes from the unordered network of the Semantic Representation (SemR) through the tree-structures of the Syntactic Representation (SyntR) to the linear chain of morphemes of the Morphological Representation (MorphR) and, ultimately, the temporally-ordered string of phones of the Phonetic Representation (PhonR). Each of the syntactic, morphological, and phonetic levels has two sub-levels, the deep (D) and surface (S) representations. This gives us a total of seven levels of representation, shown in the left column of the table in (2).
(2) Representations and components
 |
 |
Correspondence between levels is made by a set of rules or components that translate representations at level n into representations at n+1; the surface syntactic component, for example, maps between a SSyntR--an unordered dependency tree whose nodes are lexical items--and a DMorphR, an ordered chain of lexemes marked for inflexional values |
 |
Rules are written as "Rn > Rn+1 | C", where "Rn" is a structural feature of a given level (n), "Rn+1" is the corresponding feature at the next level, and "C" sets out the conditions that dictate the rule's application |
 |
Rules are intended to apply in either direction, from n to n+1 (meaning > text) and n+1 to n (text > meaning) |
 |
Rules are not transformations, but interpretive devices establishing equivalencies between the symbolic conventions of one level and those of another |
Representations at all levels are multi-faceted. The two SyntRs, for example, consist of Syntactic Struc tures (SyntS), Anaphoric Structures (Synt-AnaphS), Prosodic Structures (Synt-ProsS), and Communicative Structures (Synt-CommS); the SemR consists of a Semantic Structure (SemS) and a Communicative Structure (SemCommS--or CommS for short).
Facets of the MTT:
Explanatory-Combinatorial Lexicology:
|
At the heart of the Meaning-Text Theory is the development of formal lexicons according to the principles of explanatory-combinatorial lexicology. The Explanatory-Combinatorial Dictionary of Contemporary French (ECDCF) is the result of a research aiming at a semantically-geared, formal description of the French lexicon. Is has been developped according to the principles of the explanatory-combinatorial lexicology (Mel'cuk, Clas et Polguère 1995) , set forth within the framework of the Meaning-Text theory.
|
|
Visit the ECDCF webpage from the Observatory of Meaning-Text Linguistics |
|
Learn about the methodology behind the ECDCF (en français).
|
.
Dependency Syntax:
|
Syntactic levels of representation in the Meaning-Text Theory follow the principles of Dependency Syntax. Dependency theory was first developped by the French linguist Lucien Tesnière (1959). The first substantial English language description in the dependency grammar framework was developed in Russia during the early 1970s by Igor Mel'cuk and Nikolai Pertsov (Mel'cuk and Pertsov1987). The common formal property of dependency representations compared to other syntactic representations is this the lack of phrasal nodes, i.e., there are no phrase-structure categories.
|
|
Learn more about Dependency-Based Approaches to Syntax, (from Prague) |
|
A brief history of dependency descriptions from the Univesity of Helsinky.
|
| |
Read Papers of the Workshop on the Processing of Dependency-based Grammars
sp(COLING-ACL'98) |
| |
Buy Dependency Syntax : Theory and Practice from Amazon.com |
Online Texts:
Introductions to the Meaning-Text Theory (PDF, en français)
Lexicology/Lexicography (PDF, en français)
Semantics
Dependency Syntax
Computational Linguistics
Links:
 Observatory of Meaning-Text Linguistics
The Explanatory-Combinatorial Dictionary of Contemporary French (ECDCF)
Alain Polguère's homepage at the Université de Montréal
David Beck's homepage
The CALLex Project (Computer-Aided Learning of Lexical Functions)
List of Lexical Functions from the Decide Project in Liège
References:
Meaning-Text Theory
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
(1970). Towards a functioning model of language. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics, 198 - 207. The Hague: Mouton. |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
(1981). Meaning-Text Models: A recent trend in Soviet linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology10, 27 - 62. |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A. |
(1997) Vers une linguistique Sens-Texte. Leçon inaugurale (Vendredi 10 janvier 1997), Collège de France, Chaire internationale, 43 p. |
|
Polguère, A. |
(1998) La théorie Sens-Texte. Dialangue, Vol. 8-9, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, pp. 9-30. |
Lexicology/Lexicography
|
Dostie, G., |
I.A. Mel'cuk & A. Polguère (1999) Méthodologie d'élaboration des articles du Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. In: Mel'cuk, I. A., N. Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, L. Iordanskaja, S. Mantha & A. Polguère: Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain: recherches lexico-sémantiques IV, Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 11-28. [PDF (142 K)] |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
, A. Clas & A. Polguère (1995) Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire ['Introduction to Explanatory Combinatorial Lexicography'], Paris/Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, 256 pages. |
Semantics
|
Beck, D. |
(1997). Rheme, Theme, and communicative structure in Lushootseed and Bella Coola. In Leo Wanner (ed.), Recent Trends in Meaning-Text Theory, 93 - 135. Amsterdam: Benjamins |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
(1989). Semantic primitives from the viewpoint of Meaning-Text linguistic theory. Quaderni de SemanticaX, 65 - 102. |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
(1997). Communicative organization in natural language. Ms., University of Montreal. |
|
Polguère, A. |
(1997) Meaning-Text Semantic Networks as a Formal Language. In L. Wanner (ed.): Recent Trends in Meaning-Text Theory, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-24. |
Dependency Syntax
|
Kahane, S. |
& A. Polguère (eds.) (1998) Processing of Dependency-based Grammars: Proceedings of the Workshop, COLING-ACL'98, 15 August 1998, University of Montreal. [Files in postscript format] |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
, & Pertsov, N. V. (1987). Surface syntax of English: A formal model within the Meaning-Text framework. Amsterdam: Benjamins. |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
(1988). Dependency syntax: Theory and practice.Albany, NY: SUNY Press. |
Computational Linguistics
|
Iordanskaja, L. |
& A. Polguère (1988) Semantic Processing for Text Generation. Proceedings of the 1st International Computer Science Conference, Hong Kong, 310-318. |
|
Iordanskaja, L. |
, Kittredge, R. I. & A. Polguère (1991) Lexical Selection and Paraphrase in a Meaning-Text Generation Model. In C. Paris, W. Swartout & W. Mann (eds.): Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 293-312. |
|
Mel'cuk, I. A |
& A. Polguère (1991) Aspects of the Implementation of the Meaning-Text Model for English Text Generation. In S. Hockey & N. Ide (series eds.) & I. Lancashire (guest ed.): Research in Humanities Computing I, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press, 204-215. |
|
Polguère, A. |
(1990) Structuration et mise en jeu procédurale d'un modèle linguistique déclaratif dans un cadre de génération de texte ['Structuring and procedural activation of a declarative linguistic model in natural language generation']. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of linguistics and translation, University of Montreal. |
|
Polguère, A.. |
(2000) A "Natural" Lexicalization Model for Language Generation. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Natural Language Processing 2000 (SNLP'2000), Chiangmai, Thailand, 10-12 May 2000, 37-50. [PDF (76K)] |
General
|
Tesnière, L.. |
Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Éditions Klincksieck, Paris, 1959. |
|